Alberta Reappraising AIDS Society |
||||||
David Crowe, President Phone: +1-403-289-6609 Fax: +1-403-289-6658 Email: David.Crowe@aras.ab.ca Kathleen Newell, Treasurer |
Box 61037, Kensington Postal Outlet
Calgary, Alberta T2N 4S6 Canada |
|||||
Rethinkers | Quotes | AZT | HAART | HIV Tests | Transmission | Library |
Of all the accusations that have been leveled against my friend, Peter Duesberg, over the many years he has been challenging conventional wisdom in cancer genetics and deadly disease etiology, the one that is most frequently heard in scientific circles, and one that is impossible to counter except by extended debate, either at a scientific forum or in the journals (something that for some reason has never occurred) is that Peter abuses the literature. Either he cites so many papers that no one can read them all, or (much worse) he misquotes and draws inferences that are not appropriate from the data in the papers he cites. The latter, as I said, has been a damning accusation, impossible to refute until now.
In 1992, Duesberg published an extensive and updated review in Pharmacology & Therapeutics (55: 201-277):
describing the state of HIV/AIDS research at the time. The article is typical of Duesbergs reasoning and contains the usual number of abundant citations.
Between 1994 and 1996, thanks to the generous financial support of Seth Ian Goldberg, MD, I was able to compile a CD that contains the complete text of this monograph, with hyperlinks to approximately 85% of the hundreds of references.
I would now like to make it widely available to all serious scientists as the ultimate tool for deciding, for themselves, the questions of what the literature actually says, and what proper inferences may be drawn from the data in the scientific papers.
Also available is the NIH/NIAID Official website from 1995:
that represents the orthodox, scientific communitys position on HIV/AIDS at the time of Duesbergs monograph on the CD.
Whether the HIV/AIDS hypothesis rests on ever-changing quicksand or solid scientific bases is another contentious issue that has been bandied back and forth but never resolved. I think that a careful comparison between this ten-year old NIH document and the one currently available is useful in the resolution of this conundrum as well.
The CD is being offered under the auspices of The Virtual Library of Biotechnology for the Americas (www.ibt.unam.mx/virtual.cgi). To obtain a copy click here. For just a sample, click here. For those with slightly more advanced computer skills, a 100% free BitTorrent stream of the CD is available at www.deanesmay.com/posts/1129083829.shtml.